IntroductionThere is a lot of discussion on whether it is better to be a leader or a follower. The leader directs or manages a group of people. The follower is the person who supports and follows the leader. Most groups function well when there is a good leader and dedicated followers. However, the question remains: Is it better to be in a position to lead or follow? Let’s see what Henry and Ashley have to say about this question.
Henry (Constructive)It is better to be a leader. There are three main benefits to being a leader. First, leaders have control. They can exercise a lot of power over decisions. For example, a president has the ability to veto bills if she or he does not agree with them. Second, leaders are respected. They often get most of the glory and recognition for the group’s successes. Finally, leaders develop important skills such as delegating, public speaking, and decision making.
Ashley (Constructive) It is better to be a follower. Followers have less pressure on them. Leaders are often more stressed because they have so many responsibilities. Followers are able to contribute to their group without the stress and pressure. Furthermore, followers are more likely engaged in collaborative work. They can work with their fellow group members. They can also get advice from their leaders. On the other hand, leaders are often isolated from the rest of the group. It is lonely to be a leader.
Henry (Rebuttal)Leaders may have more stress, but they also get more recognition. It is important to gain recognition for our efforts. That is why it is better to be a leader. I disagree that leaders are often isolated from the rest of the group. Good leaders know what is going on with their group. Strong leaders also know the importance of asking for advice when they need it. The best leaders realize that working together with their followers often yields the best results.
Ashley (Rebuttal) Throughout history, leaders have often made bad decisions because they do not consult with their followers. It is not good to have too much power to make decisions. Leaders may make decisions that do not benefit their followers. Good decisions are made when leaders and followers communicate. Second, in a good organization, leaders and followers both receive recognition for their successes. Finally, leaders are not the only ones who develop important skills. Followers can also learn the skills that you listed.
Judge’s CommentsToday’s winner is Ashley. Henry committed the logical fallacy called non sequitur, which means “It does not follow,” in Latin. Debaters commit this fallacy when their conclusion does not logically follow the previous statement. Henry said, “It is important to gain recognition for our efforts. That is why it is better to be a leader.” However, being a leader does not necessarily mean that someone will gain recognition for his or her efforts. The conclusion does not follow the premise.